Comments on: Bluffers, fakers and sex surveys

By: Jane

Jane — Sat, 10 Dec 2011 17:54:28 +0000

Thanks for your comment but I’m not sure that I see the connection between your comment and this story. I do not see sex as a ‘sacred act’ but simply as ‘love-making’ that easily leads to male orgasm but less easily to female orgasm.

The point of the story is that some women can be quite confident that they experience orgasm with a partner (in this case, the woman’s husband of thirty years) but it is not necessarily the case that they know what orgasm is.

The result is that sex surveys can be highly misleading. Women think they orgasm when they don’t. Ignorance is bliss as they say and it is surprising (to me at least) just how confident and outspoken some women can be about something they evidently know nothing about.

By: rondon

rondon — Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:47:14 +0000

sex is suppose to be a sacred act..but there are some women out there who change sex partners like they change their make up..every day and usually end up looking like a clown!

By: admin

admin — Sat, 10 Dec 2011 07:00:40 +0000

“In much of the Freudian literature, and in still other studies, all tactile stimulation of one’s own body is interpreted as masturbation.

This has been particularly true in reports on younger children, especially females.

… the term masturbation has often been extended to include all activities which bring satisfaction through the rubbing, scratching, pressing, or stoking of the breasts, thighs, legs, or other parts of the body …

In consequence, published incidences of masturbation, especially in the female, have often been unduly augmented by the including of activities which we do not now consider sexual and which, as a mater of fact, few persons would consider masturbatory if they occurred in the adult male.”

(p134 ‘Sexual behavior in the human female’ by Alfred Kinsey published 1953)