Home Sexual Politics Modern sex advice Bringing more realism to sex advice

Bringing more realism to sex advice

It is natural that female sexuality is misrepresented by the media. We all watch films and read books in part to be entertained. We don’t necessarily want to see real life because we know what that’s like. We want to be uplifted by a fantasy view of the world.

Unfortunately this huge gap between sexual fantasy and reality means that men and women today are often disappointed when real life does not match up. Until we change our sexual expectations, sex will always be taboo because we end up feeling inadequate.

One sex expert admitted that sex advice is appallingly bad today but, as he put it, he is not prime minister and so cannot change what people think. I suppose it’s like global warming. The problem is so huge that no one person feels able to do anything about it.

I have to disagree. Public health organisations should provide advice that reflects women’s real life experiences. Although, erotic literature, as a form of fiction, can reflect our sexual fantasies, educational books should publish the facts about female sexuality.

Very few sources today offer sex advice or information to couples on the basis of the facts that Shere Hite highlighted in the 1970s. So today young people are still not told that vaginal intercourse is rarely orgasmic for women or that a woman is likely to struggle with orgasm during sex by any means. The fact that female masturbation is relatively uncommon is glossed over when talking about women’s knowledge of how to achieve their own sexual arousal.

Even when experts acknowledge that women do not orgasm during sex, they seem oblivious to the relationship issue. Women may accept that sex doesn’t provide female orgasm but many men expect a partner to be equally enthusiastic about sex.

Self-evidently, women’s sexual performance is not a show-stopper and so most people assume that women do not have sexual problems. Relatively few women ever consult sex clinics. How many are concerned enough about lack of orgasm to pay out over $100 an hour to find a solution? Even in my own case, I went to a clinic more for my partner’s sake than for my own.

No one seems to think it wrong that the current definition categorises huge numbers of women as sexually dysfunctional. Yet this is purely because women are assumed to respond sexually as men do. Since female orgasm is not required for reproduction I don’t see how it makes a woman dysfunctional if she doesn’t orgasm with a partner.

Kinsey commented in 1953 on the astounding variety of experiences that women report: from never having an orgasm throughout their lives to others who claim to orgasm easily and even multiple times often with minimal stimulation of any kind (physical or psychological).

It’s surprising (to me at least) that no one EVER questions how a woman can be MORE sexually responsive than a man is. Is it that we (men in particular) are fascinated by such fantastical stories, no matter how unrepresentative they may be of women in general?

Let’s be honest… We are mesmerised by stories of women who orgasm multiple times a session not just because this would be unheard of for a man. The truth is that a similar story about a man would hold little interest because there is nothing newsworthy about male orgasm.

But just how helpful is it to suggest that every woman responds sexually as men do? And how fair is it to imply that women are dysfunctional if they cannot match these experiences?

We never admit that there are many reasons why people say things. They want to impress. They say what they think other people want to hear. They need to make money and have to print what people will read or what sells.

Why do men apologise to women for sexual innuendo? Why do women rarely make sexual remarks? Why do men buy women flowers? Why does experience improve men as lovers and yet younger women are thought sexier than experienced women?

I wanted to know the answers to questions like these and I am surprised that no one else wonders. No one seems to demand that one and one must add to two. Emotional taboo and sexual politics mean that all rational argument is suspended.

Excerpt from Ways Women Orgasm (ISBN 978-0956-894700)

3 COMMENTS

  1. Huh… For some men its hard to admit with their buddies on their own experience. I’d say its competition for attention… or desperation in some cases. Heck, I’ve seen on some shows, where there are women, who never get an orgasm, where as others, they get it way too often. Its something to do with the brain. But I completely agree, that the bigger issues of sex, such as our(women and men) fantasies are not reality based, but book backed. If that makes sense.

  2. Thanks for your comment! It’s amazing that there is so little support for providing couples with the published research findings, which clearly indicate women’s much lower responsiveness compared with men’s. Unfortunately men end to be much more motivated by sexual discussions than women are so men’s views typically dominate. But men are usually more interested in promoting their fantasies that contribute to their own arousal than in any factual or realistic account of women’s sexuality.

    Most people appear oblivious to any gap between the fantasy accounts that abound and the reality of their own sexual experiences. They are happy to go along with the fantasy view. There are very few women brave enough to speak up. Most are intimidated into silence by the ego of the majority.

    Women (and their partners) need to start providing some honest accounts of their sexual lives and specifically to differentiate between how women enjoy their own responsiveness (orgasm) and how they enjoy sexual pleasuring with a lover. This site provides a starting point for those who are brave enough to leave a constructive comment.